Research and Markets has announced the addition of the "The 2011-2016 World Outlook for Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) and Video Surveillance Equipment" report to their offering.
This study covers the world outlook for closed-circuit television (CCTV) and video surveillance equipment across more than 200 countries. For each year reported, estimates are given for the latent demand, or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.), for the country in question (in millions of U.S. dollars), the percent share the country is of the region and of the globe. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a country vis-a-vis others. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each country and across countries, latent demand estimates are created.
This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved.
This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the 230 countries of the world). This study gives, however, estimates for the worldwide latent demand, or the P.I.E. for closed-circuit television (CCTV) and video surveillance equipment. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided across the world's regional and national markets. For each country, it shows estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time (positive or negative growth).
In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on international strategic planning at graduate schools of business. Another reason why sales do not equate to latent demand is exchange rates.
In this report, all figures assume the long-run efficiency of currency markets. Figures, therefore, equate values based on purchasing power parities across countries. Short-run distortions in the value of the dollar, therefore, do not figure into the estimates. Purchasing power parity estimates of country income were collected from official sources, and extrapolated using standard econometric models.
The report uses the dollar as the currency of comparison, but not as a measure of transaction volume. The units used in this report are: US$ Million.